AIR Currents

Nov 23, 2015

Editor's Note: When it comes to hurricane winds, single-family homes are not a homogeneous class. Design and construction have an enormous influence on how they behave. In this article, we take a look at how structures at opposite ends of the single-family housing spectrum—manufactured homes and large, high-value properties—perform.

The design and construction of single-family residential homes in the U.S. typically receive less engineering oversight than that of commercial and industrial structures. As a result, they experience most of the damage inflicted by hurricane winds. Still, there is a wide spectrum of single-family homes in the U.S., and their design, construction, and location, as well as the presence of secondary risk features, have an enormous influence on how they respond to high winds.

From a hazard perspective, hurricane winds are turbulent, sustained, and change in direction, creating differential pressures on the building envelope from multiple angles. Most damage is inflicted by a complex succession of uplift, suction, and torsional (twisting) forces. When one building element fails, others are at an increased risk. In addition, high winds can hurl debris against structures, causing considerable damage to cladding and windows.Qualitative and quantitative assessment of the vulnerability of differing housing types is crucial for accurate hurricane risk assessment. As with any model, it's always a useful exercise to examine the opposites of the spectrum.

Manufactured Homes

Manufactured homes are factory-built in one or more sections and assembled on-site, with or without a permanent foundation. Most of the interior finishes are installed at the factory and minimal work is done at the site. They are generally less expensive in comparison to modular and single-family homes and sometimes decrease in value over time. Manufactured homes have an integrated chassis, and can theoretically be moved to another location, although in practice few ever are. More than 64,000 units were shipped by manufacturers in 2014, and there are currently more than 8.5 million of them in the U.S. The states with the largest numbers are Florida, Texas, and North Carolina.

Justin PierceDr. Karthik Ramanathan
Senior Engineer

Justin PierceDr. Jiazhen Peng

Edited by Jonathan Kinghorn

Due to their light weight, flat-sided construction, and tenuous foundation connections, manufactured homes are, in general, highly vulnerable to wind damage. Accordingly, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) began regulating and governing their design and construction in 1974. Units manufactured before the HUD code was enforced federally in 1976 (still widely known as mobile homes) are the most vulnerable, but as regulations and guidelines have become more stringent, newer units have become progressively more resilient. Year-built information is thus a very important factor in modeling the vulnerability of manufactured homes because it determines the quality of their design, construction, and installation.

Even low to moderate wind speeds can cause significant damage to older manufactured homes, either to the home itself or as a result of failure of the anchorage system. Direct damage often includes blown-off roof panels, loss of roof framing, and loss of wall panels and framing. A manufactured home's cladding can be vulnerable to wind-borne debris, as it may not provide the same level of protection as the monolithically covered wood sheathing common to site-built homes. Windows can be broken as a result of high wind pressure or from the impact of flying debris.

Modeling the Extremes Figure 1
Figure 1. Failure of a manufactured home's wall and roof system. (Source: AIR)

Modular or Manufactured?

Modular and manufactured homes are both subsets of single-family homes and are often thought to be the same, but there are significant differences. While modular homes are also factory built in sections, most of the interior and exterior finishes are completed on-site by contractors. Modular homes use the same materials and types of permanent foundations as site-built homes, are subject to the same building codes, and should have the same longevity. Their wind vulnerability is similar to that of traditional single-family homes and superior to that of manufactured homes.


Development of Standards for the Design and Construction of Manufactured Homes

Pre-1975 No federal level building standard 
1976-1993 The first HUD code brought consistency to the quality of manufactured homes under a single design wind speed zone (70 mph fastest mile) for the continental U.S.
1994-1998 The second edition of the HUD code classified the continental U.S. into three design wind speed zones (with 70 mph, 100 mph, and 110 mph fastest mile design wind speeds in zones I, II, and III, respectively)
1999-2007 Florida proactively enforced a state-level statute for manufactured home installation beyond requirements of the HUD code
Post-2008 HUD federal level installation standard sets minimum standards for the installation of manufactured homes

Add-ons such as carports and garages are another major source of damage during hurricanes. Most are not built to the HUD code, and many are not designed to be attached to manufactured homes. Damage to these structures at high wind speeds can cause a breach of the manufactured home's envelope, resulting in significant additional damage to the host structure. Debris from disintegrating add-ons is also a potential source of damage to other homes in the vicinity. This is consistent with the test findings reported by the Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety (IBHS).

Modeling the Extremes Figure 2
Figure 2. Hurricane damage to a manufactured home's carport and roof. (Source: AIR)

Stronger winds can dislodge manufactured homes from their foundations or blow them over entirely if not properly anchored. Manufactured homes can be anchored using a variety of metal strapping or cable systems. The wind resistance of all components of these homes, including tie-downs, varies regionally due to differing construction materials and building regulations and whether the location is coastal or inland. The age of the home affects its vulnerability as well—even apart from construction codes. All components, including tie-downs, become corroded or worn and therefore more vulnerable over time.

Modeling the Extremes Figure 3
Figure 3. This manufactured home has been blown onto its side. (Source: FEMA)

Large, High-Value Homes

Although they present a larger target, large high-value homes are in general less vulnerable to hurricane winds than average-sized single-family homes. They are usually custom-built using better materials and exhibit a high quality of construction, frequently with sophisticated engineering input. They often incorporate secondary risk mitigation features and tend to be well-maintained, all of which adds to their resilience.

Modeling the Extremes Figure 4
Figure 4. A large high-value home with a complex roof structure in Florida (Source: Jonathan Palombo)

Manufactured Home High-Wind Testing

Sponsored by the American Modern Insurance Group and funded in part by AIR's parent Verisk Analytics, the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS) has conducted full-scale high-wind tests on attached structures appended to manufactured homes. For more information on physical testing, see Where the Wild Winds Blow, Part II.

The IBHS has also produced a Manufactured Home Inspection Checklist to help consumers gauge how vulnerable their home is to wind damage based on that home's location, how well it is anchored, and the type of foundation.

Analysis following recent hurricanes shows that, in general, building vulnerability (as characterized by a damage ratio, which is defined as the ratio of the repair cost to the replacement value) decreases as a home's gross area, or square footage increases. Better secondary risk mitigation features, better maintenance, and a lower relative replacement value of different building components are plausible explanations for this inverse relationship. However, a closer look at the vulnerability of buildings to externally applied loads reveals another part of the equation: imposed loads. Post-hurricane damage surveys suggest that a significant driver of insurance claims is damage to roofs from overloading caused by pressure and turbulence or by debris impact.

Differences in building and roof geometry as buildings increase in size mean differences in wind loads. In particular, larger, high-value homes tend to have more complex footprints and roof geometries compared to their average-size counterparts—and that translates to reduced loads.

To learn more, AIR engineers conducted experiments using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to understand the reduction in wind loads with increasing gross area when coupled with increased complexity in roof geometry. Idealized "virtual" buildings representing average and high-value homes were modeled. The added complexity of the larger, high-value homes was captured by changing the number of walls, corners, and the roof type (number of hip and gable ends).

Findings show that as the gross livable area—and consequently complexity of the roof—increases, the fraction of the total roof area subject to damaging critical pressure coefficients decreases. This is because of flow modification due to the structural complexity.

Modeling the Extremes Figure 5
Figure 5. The model on the top is the typical average-size home (base case). The model on the bottom shows a representative configuration of a larger home and the accompanying complexity in its roof geometry. Warmer colors show portions of the roof exceeding critical pressure thresholds, indicating where failures of roof covering, components, or sections are most likely to occur. (Source: AIR)

A distinct reduction in vulnerability was noted for homes with a square footage of more than 3,000 square feet. It must be noted, however, that the decrease in vulnerability is asymptotic: Once the square footage is beyond a certain value, there appears to be no further reduction. Note, too, that as wind speeds increase, the mitigative effects of square footage decrease and ultimately disappear.

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)

CFD has advantages over physical testing techniques. It allows researchers to model the wind and structures in full, real-world scale and to easily modify the testing model's geometry.

CFD has been instrumental in estimating the complex nature of wind flows and their effects on buildings in dense environments. And it can add value to catastrophe modeling by capturing relative changes in loading patterns due to different environmental and mitigation features.

For more information on CFD, see Where the Wild Winds Blow, Part I.


This article examined single-family homes at opposite ends of the vulnerability spectrum, but homes across the entire range of residential properties exhibit a wide variety of characteristics that affect their vulnerability to hurricane winds. A structure's resilience is determined primarily by its location and design and construction details, but size, age, maintenance history, and other factors also make significant contributions.

Findings from AIR's recent engineering research have been used to inform AIR's U.S. hurricane model update in Touchstone®, which employs wind and storm surge damage functions for different combinations of building occupancy, construction, age, and height classes. These account for the physical response of the structure to a peril, and also quantify the effects of many other macro-level factors including building codes and their enforcement.

For high-value homes, the updated model captures the reduction in vulnerability purely from the standpoint of external pressures or loads. The reduction in vulnerability due to the presence of superior features should be captured by inputting those secondary risk characteristics directly into Touchstone.

While secondary features are not currently supported for manufactured homes in Touchstone, the damage functions have been thoroughly reviewed and updated, and now account for spatial and temporal variation in vulnerability in addition to foundation anchorage systems. In the AIR model, a manufactured home's construction code (which reflects the presence or lack of foundation anchorage), year-built, and location together determine its vulnerability.

It is therefore important to collect the most detailed exposure data possible when modeling residential property, wherever it sits in the spectrum.




You’re almost done.
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the registration process, please click the link in the email we just sent you.

Unable to subscribe at this moment. Please try again after some time. Contact us if the issue persists.

The email address  is already subscribed.